30th July 2014

Photo reblogged from I'VE BEEN DRAWING DICKS with 10 notes

agarthan-executioner:

Have some rude zombie slayer (and controller of the zombies) doodles.
(Guess who got his scanner working?)

agarthan-executioner:

Have some rude zombie slayer (and controller of the zombies) doodles.

(Guess who got his scanner working?)

()

Source: agarthan-executioner

30th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from RESIDENT SNAIL NERD with 1,127 notes

hanari-502:

Looking for someone who enjoys gun shows and quiet nights of surveillance. Must not have a problem dating a girl who cannot disclose any details about her professional life. Would be nice if you also worked 364 days of the year. Now that i’m writing this out I’m starting to think that this person doesn’t exist…

Welp here’s that Miss Pauling photoset I blasted out my ass in a literal day. Any Scouts out there looking for an eligible girl who can wield a shotgun and bury bodies at the same time…are unfortunately in the wrong place. Business before pleasure! I’ve got to do my job or The Administrator will have my head.

Miss Pauling | Photographer

()

Source: hanari-502

30th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from Lazy Good-For-Nothing with 125 notes

snowontheradio:

A trio of sketch commissions for narcolepticinsomniac! Pretty sure that they’re, like, the mythical perfect commissioner, since I was not only asked to draw two of my fave characters but one of my own characters as well. HOW FUN IS THAT. Hope you like it, dude!

()

Source: snowontheradio

30th July 2014

Photo reblogged from again with the screwing of the doctor with 10 notes

dicktofen:

oh yeah btw I got my pillow with thetrollmother’s drawing on it!! it is soft and comfy and I regret nothing
also I got a haircut or smth w/e

dicktofen:

oh yeah btw I got my pillow with thetrollmother’s drawing on it!! it is soft and comfy and I regret nothing

also I got a haircut or smth w/e

()

30th July 2014

Post reblogged from again with the screwing of the doctor with 701,183 notes

There’s over 9 million users on Tumblr now. Reblog if you’re one of the few who’s never EVER left anon hate in somebody’s ask box.

thepoopmanga:

satanwholock:

t-t-t-troyler:

churrosforthewin:

furwolf76:

If you can’t reblog this…

image

NEVER HAVE NEVER WILL

That’s a fucking low number. That’s fucking sad.

never never never never

wtf is stopping someone from reblogging this if they have. are there magic boundaries surrounding the reblog button here. if you reblogged this you just want a medal for not being an asshole and that is in itself an asshole thing to do. im sending everyone who reblogged this anon hate

ASHES PLEASE

()

Source: la-diswavves

30th July 2014

Photo reblogged from The Onion with 429 notes

theonion:

Patient Zero Kicking Back In 38C With Episode Of ‘New Girl’

theonion:

Patient Zero Kicking Back In 38C With Episode Of ‘New Girl’

()

30th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from Giddy Up! with 201,184 notes

giddytf2:

hobbitballerina:

chelseawelseyknight:

witchesbitchesandbritches:

lifeundefeated:

Yea it’s clearly our “generation that’s making homosexuality a trend.” Seriously, pisses me off when people say that. look at this! It’s always been around, it’s not a trend, it’s real. It’s beautiful.

These are really beautiful images.

This makes me really happy

There’s a long history of lesbian-like activity in the West.  In the 19th century US, especially after the Civil War killed off so many young men, middle-class and other genteel girls were encouraged in Boston marriages — relationships with other women of similar educational and class backgrounds.  Since women were considered naturally chaste and disinterested in sex, these love affairs were seen as innocent and spiritual.  Women’s lives were wholly separate from men’s that young women infrequently had male friends who weren’t considered a marriage prospect.  They were encouraged to keep to all-female social circles, and the advent of women’s colleges further encouraged that.  Women were expected to mentor each other, love each other, dance with each other, with the older woman acting as the cavalier, the man in the relationship, protecting and guiding the younger, pursuing her and courting her in ways not unlike how young men would court their brides.  But the prevailing cultural wisdom was that these relationships would be limited to kisses and poetry — women were incapable of sexual desire, they tolerated sex in heterosexual marriages because men were sex-driven beasts who demanded it of them.  Without a man, it was presumed that these relationships would be chaste, innocent, and wholly emotional.  Lesbian-like behaviour is most tolerated when women are perceived as less sexual than men.  Homosexual behaviour becomes threatening when sex is involved — when, in the 1920s, women were seen as able to have sexual drives and the idea of sexually companionable marriages came onto the landscape, Boston marriages suddenly became unnatural and disgusting because they directed women’s sexual interests towards other women instead of to the proper channels: towards men.  The flapper was all about the sexually available (to men) young woman.  She contributed to the demise of widely accepted lesbian or lesbian-like relationships.  As soon as the flapper was capable of wanting sex herself instead of tolerating it from her male partner, lesbian/lesbian-like relationships were threatening, deviant, and ruined young women’s chances to become good wives and mothers.

So remember this as you look at the pre-1920s images.  Those women were allowed these passionate loves, even encouraged in them (sometimes after they managed to get a husband, Eleanor Roosevelt in particular), all because the patriarchy was convinced that women weren’t capable of sexual feelings towards one another.  As long as women were seen as desexed, as creatures of sentiment and emotion instead of passion and desire, lesbianism wasn’t a threat.  The minute women were regarded by patriarchal culture as having a natural sex drive, lesbian-like behaviour became deviant and damning.

We didn’t invent homosexuality in the past 20 or 30 or 50 years.  But we continue to labour under the belief and cultural expectation that women’s sexuality is something owed to and owned by men, forever de-legitimising women’s relationships unless men in some way benefit. 

Good commentary.

()

Source: babycocodill

30th July 2014

Post reblogged from rock and roll french fries with 23,245 notes

ATTENTION LGBTQ YOUTH IN TEXAS:

lezbian-chic:

Governor elections are coming up really soon.

Your main tickets are:

Tx. attorney general Greg Abbott (R)

Senator Wendy Davis (D)


Abbott is for “traditional values” AKA against gay rights.

Davis is all for LGBTQ rights.

IF WENDY DAVIS IS ELECTED TEXAS MAY FINALLY LEGALIZE GAY MARRIAGE BY NEXT YEAR.

ALL WE NEED TO DO IS VOTE!!!!!


REBLOG TO SAVE LIVES

()

Source: lezbian-chic

30th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from cough into my open mouth with 6,116 notes

iguanamouth:

not again

()

30th July 2014

Photo reblogged from Giddy Up! with 34,137 notes

giddytf2:

monobeartheater:

absorr:

ultrafacts:

Source For more posts like this, CLICK HERE to follow Ultrafacts 

 Some of you are reblogging because you think its funny that programmers would talk to ducks. I’m reblogging because I think its funny picturing a programmer explaining their code, realizing what they did when they explain the bad code, then grabbing the strangling the duck while yelling “WHY WAS THE FIX THAT SIMPLE!? AM I GOING BLIND!”

AS A PROGRAMMER I CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU FUCKING DO WE HAD TO BAN THE DUCKS FROM MY CLASSES BECAUSE EVERYONE WOULD FLIP THE DUCK OR THROW IT AT A WALL OR SOMETHING WHEN THEY FIGURED OUT THE PROBLEM IN THEIR CODE

What a fantastic idea for writers too! I imagine that telling a rubber duck your story will help you figure out what works and what doesn’t.
(Then again I technically have a ‘rubber duck’ in my head already, hence talking to myself in the shoes of the characters.)

giddytf2:

monobeartheater:

absorr:

ultrafacts:

Source For more posts like this, CLICK HERE to follow Ultrafacts

 Some of you are reblogging because you think its funny that programmers would talk to ducks. I’m reblogging because I think its funny picturing a programmer explaining their code, realizing what they did when they explain the bad code, then grabbing the strangling the duck while yelling “WHY WAS THE FIX THAT SIMPLE!? AM I GOING BLIND!”

AS A PROGRAMMER I CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU FUCKING DO WE HAD TO BAN THE DUCKS FROM MY CLASSES BECAUSE EVERYONE WOULD FLIP THE DUCK OR THROW IT AT A WALL OR SOMETHING WHEN THEY FIGURED OUT THE PROBLEM IN THEIR CODE

What a fantastic idea for writers too! I imagine that telling a rubber duck your story will help you figure out what works and what doesn’t.

(Then again I technically have a ‘rubber duck’ in my head already, hence talking to myself in the shoes of the characters.)

()

Source: ultrafacts